<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 254 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101189</link>
    <description>Section 186 of the Companies Act, 1956 is described as conferring power to order a company meeting even on the authority&#039;s own motion, so an application by a member is maintainable and not barred merely by delay where the underlying deadlock persists. The text also states that rival control claims, uncertainty over the registered office, and continuing management disputes may make it impracticable to convene a valid meeting through ordinary company machinery. It further notes that the authority may issue ancillary directions to identify eligible attendees and frame meeting business so the meeting can function effectively. No natural justice breach is shown where no prejudice or unanswered representation is established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:10:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 254 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101189</link>
      <description>Section 186 of the Companies Act, 1956 is described as conferring power to order a company meeting even on the authority&#039;s own motion, so an application by a member is maintainable and not barred merely by delay where the underlying deadlock persists. The text also states that rival control claims, uncertainty over the registered office, and continuing management disputes may make it impracticable to convene a valid meeting through ordinary company machinery. It further notes that the authority may issue ancillary directions to identify eligible attendees and frame meeting business so the meeting can function effectively. No natural justice breach is shown where no prejudice or unanswered representation is established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>