<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 427 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101185</link>
    <description>Dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F was found unsustainable because no notice of hearing was issued before final rejection and the assessee&#039;s plea of sickness before BIFR was not considered. The absence of hearing violated natural justice, and the interim stay order also showed non-application of mind to a material circumstance relevant to the stay request. The rejection order was set aside, the matter was remanded for fresh disposal on merits in accordance with law, and the stay application was directed to be reconsidered by a speaking order after hearing the party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:07:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 427 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101185</link>
      <description>Dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F was found unsustainable because no notice of hearing was issued before final rejection and the assessee&#039;s plea of sickness before BIFR was not considered. The absence of hearing violated natural justice, and the interim stay order also showed non-application of mind to a material circumstance relevant to the stay request. The rejection order was set aside, the matter was remanded for fresh disposal on merits in accordance with law, and the stay application was directed to be reconsidered by a speaking order after hearing the party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>