<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 418 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101176</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed both appeals by remanding the case for further examination, emphasizing the necessity of precise testing and technical evaluation to ascertain the nature of imported goods accurately. The judgment focused on resolving the dispute regarding the classification of the goods and highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence and procedural adherence in customs cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:59:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 418 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101176</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed both appeals by remanding the case for further examination, emphasizing the necessity of precise testing and technical evaluation to ascertain the nature of imported goods accurately. The judgment focused on resolving the dispute regarding the classification of the goods and highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence and procedural adherence in customs cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>