<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 408 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101166</link>
    <description>In a stay application concerning inclusion of transportation charges in assessable value, CEGAT granted only partial interim relief on a prima facie assessment of the record and the equities of the case. The applicants argued that transportation charges were separately collected and, under amended Rule 5 of the Valuation Rules, would not form part of assessable value; the authority found this contention worthy of detailed examination at final hearing but treated any lapse as procedural for interim purposes. Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined, but deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs was ordered and, subject to compliance, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:48:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 408 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101166</link>
      <description>In a stay application concerning inclusion of transportation charges in assessable value, CEGAT granted only partial interim relief on a prima facie assessment of the record and the equities of the case. The applicants argued that transportation charges were separately collected and, under amended Rule 5 of the Valuation Rules, would not form part of assessable value; the authority found this contention worthy of detailed examination at final hearing but treated any lapse as procedural for interim purposes. Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined, but deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs was ordered and, subject to compliance, the balance pre-deposit was waived and recovery stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>