<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 194 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101164</link>
    <description>For claims against a company in liquidation, limitation runs until the winding-up order is made, not from the date of the winding-up petition. A debt already barred on the date of the winding-up order cannot be admitted in liquidation, and the doctrine of relation back does not suspend limitation from the petition date. The Court also clarified that Jwala Prasad had been misread below and did not treat the petition date as the operative date for limitation. The claim, being time-barred on the winding-up order date, could not be proved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 194 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101164</link>
      <description>For claims against a company in liquidation, limitation runs until the winding-up order is made, not from the date of the winding-up petition. A debt already barred on the date of the winding-up order cannot be admitted in liquidation, and the doctrine of relation back does not suspend limitation from the petition date. The Court also clarified that Jwala Prasad had been misread below and did not treat the petition date as the operative date for limitation. The claim, being time-barred on the winding-up order date, could not be proved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>