<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 585 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101160</link>
    <description>Imported goods origin had to be determined on the party&#039;s specific plea that the goods were of mixed origin, supported by a certificate from distributors or suppliers. Because the adjudicating order did not address or record any finding on that contention, it could not finally decide the matter on an assumed Japanese origin. The matter was remanded for fresh examination and a new order after giving the party an opportunity to substantiate its claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:44:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 585 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101160</link>
      <description>Imported goods origin had to be determined on the party&#039;s specific plea that the goods were of mixed origin, supported by a certificate from distributors or suppliers. Because the adjudicating order did not address or record any finding on that contention, it could not finally decide the matter on an assumed Japanese origin. The matter was remanded for fresh examination and a new order after giving the party an opportunity to substantiate its claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>