<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 578 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101147</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld penalties imposed under the Customs Act, 1962, on individuals caught smuggling gold pieces of foreign origin. Despite conflicting statements and denials by the accused, their initial admissions and well-documented evidence led to the penalties being upheld. The penalties were reduced by the Commissioner (Appeals) but ultimately maintained by the tribunal, dismissing the appeals for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:34:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 578 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101147</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld penalties imposed under the Customs Act, 1962, on individuals caught smuggling gold pieces of foreign origin. Despite conflicting statements and denials by the accused, their initial admissions and well-documented evidence led to the penalties being upheld. The penalties were reduced by the Commissioner (Appeals) but ultimately maintained by the tribunal, dismissing the appeals for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>