https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101145 Section 155(4)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 was construed as referring to the High Court's character, not to a requirement that the appeal be heard by a Bench of three or more Judges. The rectification remedy was treated as a statutory company-court jurisdiction, with the appeal confined to the grounds under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The provision was also viewed as a valid classification between larger and smaller High Courts, and the absence of an intra-court appeal in smaller High Courts was described as a legislative choice subject to constitutional correction if necessary. An appeal lies to a Division Bench. en-us Mon, 13 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:31:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101145 Section 155(4)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 was construed as referring to the High Court's character, not to a requirement that the appeal be heard by a Bench of three or more Judges. The rectification remedy was treated as a statutory company-court jurisdiction, with the appeal confined to the grounds under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The provision was also viewed as a valid classification between larger and smaller High Courts, and the absence of an intra-court appeal in smaller High Courts was described as a legislative choice subject to constitutional correction if necessary. An appeal lies to a Division Bench. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 13 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101145