<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 275 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101143</link>
    <description>The court adjourned a petition for winding up a company due to unpaid debts under a collaboration agreement, allowing the petitioner to seek revival and the respondent to seek dismissal based on arbitration. The court considered the financial stability of the respondent, potential coercion in winding-up jurisdiction, and ongoing arbitration proceedings. Emphasizing fairness and avoiding disruption, the court opted for an adjournment with liberty to revive, awaiting arbitration resolution rather than making a hasty decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:27:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 275 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101143</link>
      <description>The court adjourned a petition for winding up a company due to unpaid debts under a collaboration agreement, allowing the petitioner to seek revival and the respondent to seek dismissal based on arbitration. The court considered the financial stability of the respondent, potential coercion in winding-up jurisdiction, and ongoing arbitration proceedings. Emphasizing fairness and avoiding disruption, the court opted for an adjournment with liberty to revive, awaiting arbitration resolution rather than making a hasty decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>