https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101131 An accidental omission in the body of the Tribunal's order was corrected as a mistake apparent from the record because the order as a whole, the open-court pronouncement, and the concluding disposal showed that the duty demand and reduced penalty covered all three connected appeals. The earlier references suggesting only one demand were treated as inadvertent drafting errors. The rectification therefore clarified that duty was payable at 8% on the entire quantity and that the penalty of Rs. 50,000 applied across the full set of appeals. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:10:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101131 An accidental omission in the body of the Tribunal's order was corrected as a mistake apparent from the record because the order as a whole, the open-court pronouncement, and the concluding disposal showed that the duty demand and reduced penalty covered all three connected appeals. The earlier references suggesting only one demand were treated as inadvertent drafting errors. The rectification therefore clarified that duty was payable at 8% on the entire quantity and that the penalty of Rs. 50,000 applied across the full set of appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101131