<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (3) TMI 158 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101130</link>
    <description>Where a deceased assessee had already been served in lifetime with notice to produce accounts and documents, the court held that section 7-C(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act did not require a fresh notice to the legal representatives for the same assessment purpose, so the assessment orders were sustained. It further held that service of a notice of demand under section 8 was a condition precedent to coercive recovery; as no such notice had been served on the legal representatives, the recovery proceedings and certificates were invalid and were quashed. The appeals therefore succeeded only in part.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (3) TMI 158 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101130</link>
      <description>Where a deceased assessee had already been served in lifetime with notice to produce accounts and documents, the court held that section 7-C(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act did not require a fresh notice to the legal representatives for the same assessment purpose, so the assessment orders were sustained. It further held that service of a notice of demand under section 8 was a condition precedent to coercive recovery; as no such notice had been served on the legal representatives, the recovery proceedings and certificates were invalid and were quashed. The appeals therefore succeeded only in part.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>