https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101127 A transfer of shares made after commencement of winding-up was void and could not support an application to revive the company or stay the winding-up on that footing alone, although contributories were not wholly barred from moving the court. The proposed revival scheme also lacked confidence in funding and liability repayment. On disclaimer, where the court directs the official liquidator to disclaim leasehold property at the instance of the adverse party, the order itself makes the disclaimer operative; the liquidator's failure to file the disclaimer does not defeat it. Subsequent relief undertaking notifications could not revive an interest already validly disclaimed. en-us Wed, 13 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101127 A transfer of shares made after commencement of winding-up was void and could not support an application to revive the company or stay the winding-up on that footing alone, although contributories were not wholly barred from moving the court. The proposed revival scheme also lacked confidence in funding and liability repayment. On disclaimer, where the court directs the official liquidator to disclaim leasehold property at the instance of the adverse party, the order itself makes the disclaimer operative; the liquidator's failure to file the disclaimer does not defeat it. Subsequent relief undertaking notifications could not revive an interest already validly disclaimed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 13 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101127