<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 558 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101125</link>
    <description>Where a demand covered the same goods and the same period already decided by an earlier appellate order that had attained finality, the repeated duty and penalty demand did not prima facie appear sustainable. On that basis, the applicant was granted relief from making pre-deposit pending disposal of the appeal, and the pre-deposit of duty and equal penalty was waived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:04:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 558 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101125</link>
      <description>Where a demand covered the same goods and the same period already decided by an earlier appellate order that had attained finality, the repeated duty and penalty demand did not prima facie appear sustainable. On that basis, the applicant was granted relief from making pre-deposit pending disposal of the appeal, and the pre-deposit of duty and equal penalty was waived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>