https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101111 A refund claim concerning clearance of levy sugar at the duty rate applicable to free-sale sugar could not be finally resolved on the existing record because the order-in-appeal relied on a letter for a different month, while the relevant release order for the disputed month contained no provision for reimbursement of differential duty. The mismatch in the supporting material made the earlier adjudication unsatisfactory. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for de novo consideration after granting the appellants a personal hearing. en-us Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:45:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101111 A refund claim concerning clearance of levy sugar at the duty rate applicable to free-sale sugar could not be finally resolved on the existing record because the order-in-appeal relied on a letter for a different month, while the relevant release order for the disputed month contained no provision for reimbursement of differential duty. The mismatch in the supporting material made the earlier adjudication unsatisfactory. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for de novo consideration after granting the appellants a personal hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101111