<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (1) TMI 151 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101108</link>
    <description>The article explains that the listed forms of &quot;iron and steel&quot; in section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act are separate commercial commodities, not one taxable substance. The use of &quot;that is to say&quot; and the separate enumeration of sub-items means each item retains its own identity for sales tax purposes, so a transformed finished product may be taxed even if its raw material was taxed earlier. It also states that the Tamil Nadu sales tax levy on the declared goods was not shown to violate section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act or article 286(3) of the Constitution, and was therefore supported by the statutory scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (1) TMI 151 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101108</link>
      <description>The article explains that the listed forms of &quot;iron and steel&quot; in section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act are separate commercial commodities, not one taxable substance. The use of &quot;that is to say&quot; and the separate enumeration of sub-items means each item retains its own identity for sales tax purposes, so a transformed finished product may be taxed even if its raw material was taxed earlier. It also states that the Tamil Nadu sales tax levy on the declared goods was not shown to violate section 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act or article 286(3) of the Constitution, and was therefore supported by the statutory scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>