<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 325 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101106</link>
    <description>Failure to hold the annual general meeting and to file the balance-sheet and profit and loss account within the statutory time was treated as an offence punishable with fine only, so the right to prosecute accrued when filing became due. Applying Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court held that cognizance was barred after expiry of the limitation period. The argument that the default was a continuing offence was rejected because the wording of Section 162(1) did not support that characterisation. The complaint was therefore time-barred and the prosecution could not proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:41:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 325 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101106</link>
      <description>Failure to hold the annual general meeting and to file the balance-sheet and profit and loss account within the statutory time was treated as an offence punishable with fine only, so the right to prosecute accrued when filing became due. Applying Section 468 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Court held that cognizance was barred after expiry of the limitation period. The argument that the default was a continuing offence was rejected because the wording of Section 162(1) did not support that characterisation. The complaint was therefore time-barred and the prosecution could not proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>