https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101102 The Tribunal held that the demand of excise duty for the period from 1-3-94 to 31-3-94 was barred by limitation. The matter of quantifying duty for the period from 1-4-94 to 31-10-94 was remanded for proper quantification. The Tribunal clarified that certain adjustments made by the adjudicating authority were towards fines, not duty, and reduced a redemption fine due to a typographical error. The penalty imposed was upheld, emphasizing the importance of accurate quantification and clarification on adjustments. en-us Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:33:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101102 The Tribunal held that the demand of excise duty for the period from 1-3-94 to 31-3-94 was barred by limitation. The matter of quantifying duty for the period from 1-4-94 to 31-10-94 was remanded for proper quantification. The Tribunal clarified that certain adjustments made by the adjudicating authority were towards fines, not duty, and reduced a redemption fine due to a typographical error. The penalty imposed was upheld, emphasizing the importance of accurate quantification and clarification on adjustments. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101102