https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101087 Goods found bearing another person's brand name, "SUPER FIVE STAR", were held liable to confiscation because the marking appeared on the goods and the explanation of accidental use of an old die did not displace that finding. The confiscation was therefore sustained. However, the redemption fine and penalty were considered excessive on the recorded facts and were reduced. The operative principle is that branded goods using another party's mark may attract confiscation, but the monetary consequences must remain proportionate to the circumstances. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:38:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101087 Goods found bearing another person's brand name, "SUPER FIVE STAR", were held liable to confiscation because the marking appeared on the goods and the explanation of accidental use of an old die did not displace that finding. The confiscation was therefore sustained. However, the redemption fine and penalty were considered excessive on the recorded facts and were reduced. The operative principle is that branded goods using another party's mark may attract confiscation, but the monetary consequences must remain proportionate to the circumstances. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101087