<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 513 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101082</link>
    <description>The appeal for a refund claim for damaged imported goods under Sections 21 &amp;amp; 22 of the Customs Act, 1962 was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi. The Asstt. Commissioner of Customs and Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the claim due to insufficient explanation on the refund amount calculation and absence of a joint survey with customs authorities. The Tribunal held that the damage did not align with the criteria specified in Sections 21 and 22, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:31:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 513 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101082</link>
      <description>The appeal for a refund claim for damaged imported goods under Sections 21 &amp;amp; 22 of the Customs Act, 1962 was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, New Delhi. The Asstt. Commissioner of Customs and Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the claim due to insufficient explanation on the refund amount calculation and absence of a joint survey with customs authorities. The Tribunal held that the damage did not align with the criteria specified in Sections 21 and 22, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>