https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101065 Section 141 CPC and Rule 6 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 extend suit procedure to company petition proceedings unless the Companies Act or the Rules provide a different procedure. As no contrary procedure was shown, Order 22 Rule 4 applied to the proceeding. Because the respondents had died long before and no application was filed within the limitation period to bring their legal representatives on record, the consequence under Order 22 Rule 4(3) followed. The petition was held to have abated, and the argument that Order 22 Rule 4 did not apply was rejected. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:02:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101065 Section 141 CPC and Rule 6 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 extend suit procedure to company petition proceedings unless the Companies Act or the Rules provide a different procedure. As no contrary procedure was shown, Order 22 Rule 4 applied to the proceeding. Because the respondents had died long before and no application was filed within the limitation period to bring their legal representatives on record, the consequence under Order 22 Rule 4(3) followed. The petition was held to have abated, and the argument that Order 22 Rule 4 did not apply was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 28 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101065