https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101045 In stay and pre-deposit proceedings, the Tribunal found that annual production capacity had been determined from data furnished by the applicant and treated the applicant's letters as opting out of Rule 96ZO(3). On a prima facie basis, the capacity determination was held applicable for the relevant period, and the Tribunal balanced the differential duty and the applicant's financial position by refusing complete waiver. A partial pre-deposit was ordered, and recovery of the balance duty and penalty was stayed on compliance with the deposit direction. en-us Tue, 15 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:38:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101045 In stay and pre-deposit proceedings, the Tribunal found that annual production capacity had been determined from data furnished by the applicant and treated the applicant's letters as opting out of Rule 96ZO(3). On a prima facie basis, the capacity determination was held applicable for the relevant period, and the Tribunal balanced the differential duty and the applicant's financial position by refusing complete waiver. A partial pre-deposit was ordered, and recovery of the balance duty and penalty was stayed on compliance with the deposit direction. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 15 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101045