<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (7) TMI 277 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101039</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions as the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case for winding up the company. The court highlighted that the petitioners have alternative remedies under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act and deemed their request for a winding-up order as unreasonable. The dismissal was without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:29:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (7) TMI 277 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101039</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions as the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case for winding up the company. The court highlighted that the petitioners have alternative remedies under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act and deemed their request for a winding-up order as unreasonable. The dismissal was without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>