<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 472 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case regarding the inclusion of inspection charges in the assessable value of Railway Equipment manufactured by M/s. Greysham and Co. The decision emphasized the necessity of establishing whether the appellants had their testing facility before determining the inclusion of testing charges in the assessable value. The matter was sent back to the adjudicating authority for clarification on this crucial factual aspect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:24:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 472 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case regarding the inclusion of inspection charges in the assessable value of Railway Equipment manufactured by M/s. Greysham and Co. The decision emphasized the necessity of establishing whether the appellants had their testing facility before determining the inclusion of testing charges in the assessable value. The matter was sent back to the adjudicating authority for clarification on this crucial factual aspect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>