https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101020 In proceedings seeking expunction of remarks from an earlier company judgment, the High Court held that inherent powers under section 151 CPC could not be used to remove passages forming part of the main reasoning; alteration of a signed judgment was confined to section 152 or review, and the application therefore failed. It further held that the managing directors could not invoke natural justice to secure expunction where they were not strangers to the proceedings, had notice of the allegations, and had an opportunity to file affidavits and meet the case. Remarks supported by the evidence and integral to the findings were not liable to be deleted. en-us Wed, 15 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:58:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101020 In proceedings seeking expunction of remarks from an earlier company judgment, the High Court held that inherent powers under section 151 CPC could not be used to remove passages forming part of the main reasoning; alteration of a signed judgment was confined to section 152 or review, and the application therefore failed. It further held that the managing directors could not invoke natural justice to secure expunction where they were not strangers to the proceedings, had notice of the allegations, and had an opportunity to file affidavits and meet the case. Remarks supported by the evidence and integral to the findings were not liable to be deleted. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 15 Jun 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101020