<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 445 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty on Shri Pranab Sarkar for transporting gold but directed him to deposit Rs. 5,000 due to financial hardship. Shri Bhabesh Ch. Mondal, the motor cycle owner, was not implicated in the smuggling and his stay petition was unconditionally allowed. Compliance was required by a specified date for final disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 445 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty on Shri Pranab Sarkar for transporting gold but directed him to deposit Rs. 5,000 due to financial hardship. Shri Bhabesh Ch. Mondal, the motor cycle owner, was not implicated in the smuggling and his stay petition was unconditionally allowed. Compliance was required by a specified date for final disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>