<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 422 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100986</link>
    <description>Where classification of a product has already been finally settled in favour of the assessee, a fresh demand for differential duty on a contrary classification cannot survive. The Tribunal noted that the classification dispute had been conclusively decided and affirmed by the Supreme Court, and that a later assessment under the assessee&#039;s claimed heading had also attained finality without challenge. On that basis, the authorities treated the classification issue as closed and refused to sustain a renewed demand. The differential duty demand was therefore held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:08:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 422 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100986</link>
      <description>Where classification of a product has already been finally settled in favour of the assessee, a fresh demand for differential duty on a contrary classification cannot survive. The Tribunal noted that the classification dispute had been conclusively decided and affirmed by the Supreme Court, and that a later assessment under the assessee&#039;s claimed heading had also attained finality without challenge. On that basis, the authorities treated the classification issue as closed and refused to sustain a renewed demand. The differential duty demand was therefore held unsustainable and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>