<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 419 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100984</link>
    <description>Rule 57G, as amended, provided that Modvat credit should not be denied merely because the declaration did not contain all required details; that approach was applied to pending disputes, and the credit claim was sustained where the input was otherwise covered by the declaration describing &quot;Brass parts&quot;. Denial of Modvat credit for Brass Gutka solely on the basis of incomplete declaration details could not be maintained, and the assessee remained entitled to the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:03:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 419 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100984</link>
      <description>Rule 57G, as amended, provided that Modvat credit should not be denied merely because the declaration did not contain all required details; that approach was applied to pending disputes, and the credit claim was sustained where the input was otherwise covered by the declaration describing &quot;Brass parts&quot;. Denial of Modvat credit for Brass Gutka solely on the basis of incomplete declaration details could not be maintained, and the assessee remained entitled to the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>