<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (11) TMI 228 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100981</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, the dismissal order was set aside, and the winding-up petition was restored for further consideration by the company judge. The parties were directed to bear their own costs, and any opposing affidavits regarding the principal amount claim were to be considered. The Notice of Motion was also disposed of accordingly with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:02:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (11) TMI 228 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100981</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, the dismissal order was set aside, and the winding-up petition was restored for further consideration by the company judge. The parties were directed to bear their own costs, and any opposing affidavits regarding the principal amount claim were to be considered. The Notice of Motion was also disposed of accordingly with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>