<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 221 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100975</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta held that the adjournment of an annual general meeting cannot extend beyond the statutory period as prescribed by the Companies Act, 1956. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with statutory requirements, including the timing of annual general meetings and submission of financial documents. The petitioners&#039; argument that the adjourned meeting was a continuation of the earlier meeting was rejected, and they were found liable under both section 166 and section 210(5) of the Act. The Court refused the petitioners&#039; request for a certificate of fitness for appeal to the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:53:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 221 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100975</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta held that the adjournment of an annual general meeting cannot extend beyond the statutory period as prescribed by the Companies Act, 1956. The Court emphasized the importance of complying with statutory requirements, including the timing of annual general meetings and submission of financial documents. The petitioners&#039; argument that the adjourned meeting was a continuation of the earlier meeting was rejected, and they were found liable under both section 166 and section 210(5) of the Act. The Court refused the petitioners&#039; request for a certificate of fitness for appeal to the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>