<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 220 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100974</link>
    <description>The court found that the registration of the fourth respondent company with the name &quot;Methodist Church of India&quot; was misleading and likely to cause confusion, potentially leading to the misrepresentation and misuse of church properties. The court held that the Registrar of Companies failed to conduct a proper inquiry into the company&#039;s connection with the Methodist Church. It was ruled that the fourth respondent&#039;s name should be removed from the register, and they were restrained from using the words &quot;Methodist Church&quot; in their name. The petitioners were granted the name &quot;Methodist Church in India Trust Association P. Ltd.&quot; without needing a &quot;no objection&quot; certificate. The Bombay High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the petition due to the impact on the petitioners&#039; properties in Bombay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 220 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100974</link>
      <description>The court found that the registration of the fourth respondent company with the name &quot;Methodist Church of India&quot; was misleading and likely to cause confusion, potentially leading to the misrepresentation and misuse of church properties. The court held that the Registrar of Companies failed to conduct a proper inquiry into the company&#039;s connection with the Methodist Church. It was ruled that the fourth respondent&#039;s name should be removed from the register, and they were restrained from using the words &quot;Methodist Church&quot; in their name. The petitioners were granted the name &quot;Methodist Church in India Trust Association P. Ltd.&quot; without needing a &quot;no objection&quot; certificate. The Bombay High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the petition due to the impact on the petitioners&#039; properties in Bombay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>