<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (8) TMI 243 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100965</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, directing the parties to appear before the learned single judge for further proceedings, emphasizing the need to uphold justice without undue delay in the trial of the ejectment applications against the respondent-company in liquidation. The court set aside the adjournment orders and emphasized the importance of continuing the trial promptly in accordance with the earlier orders transferring the proceedings to the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:15:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (8) TMI 243 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100965</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, directing the parties to appear before the learned single judge for further proceedings, emphasizing the need to uphold justice without undue delay in the trial of the ejectment applications against the respondent-company in liquidation. The court set aside the adjournment orders and emphasized the importance of continuing the trial promptly in accordance with the earlier orders transferring the proceedings to the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>