<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 375 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100959</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q(1)(bbb) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is attracted only where a registered dealer wilfully enters wrong or incorrect particulars in an invoice with intent to enable inadmissible credit. On the record, there was no allegation or finding of such wilful or intentional conduct, and the amount earlier ordered to be recovered had already been set aside and was not challenged by the Revenue. The statutory precondition for penal action was therefore not met, and the penalty was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=138009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 375 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100959</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q(1)(bbb) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is attracted only where a registered dealer wilfully enters wrong or incorrect particulars in an invoice with intent to enable inadmissible credit. On the record, there was no allegation or finding of such wilful or intentional conduct, and the amount earlier ordered to be recovered had already been set aside and was not challenged by the Revenue. The statutory precondition for penal action was therefore not met, and the penalty was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>