https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100953 The court did not pass any orders on the application, noting that the petitioners failed to establish substantial injustice. All interim orders were vacated, and the special officers were discharged. The court recorded that respondent No. 2 would not obstruct petitioner No. 2 from exercising his shareholder rights. There was no order as to costs, and the prayer for a stay of operation of the judgment was refused. en-us Wed, 02 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:44:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100953 The court did not pass any orders on the application, noting that the petitioners failed to establish substantial injustice. All interim orders were vacated, and the special officers were discharged. The court recorded that respondent No. 2 would not obstruct petitioner No. 2 from exercising his shareholder rights. There was no order as to costs, and the prayer for a stay of operation of the judgment was refused. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 02 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100953