https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100952 The court ruled in a case involving an extraordinary general meeting to discuss proposed resolutions related to a scheme of amalgamation. An injunction was initially granted against the company considering all proposed resolutions, but during the appeal, the injunction was confirmed only for one resolution. The court emphasized that shareholder discussions on modifying the scheme did not impede the court's power to sanction the scheme. Shareholders were allowed to discuss and approve modifications at a properly requisitioned meeting without infringing upon the court's jurisdiction. Ultimately, the court permitted discussions limited to renegotiating with another company at the requisitioned meeting. en-us Thu, 05 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:39:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100952 The court ruled in a case involving an extraordinary general meeting to discuss proposed resolutions related to a scheme of amalgamation. An injunction was initially granted against the company considering all proposed resolutions, but during the appeal, the injunction was confirmed only for one resolution. The court emphasized that shareholder discussions on modifying the scheme did not impede the court's power to sanction the scheme. Shareholders were allowed to discuss and approve modifications at a properly requisitioned meeting without infringing upon the court's jurisdiction. Ultimately, the court permitted discussions limited to renegotiating with another company at the requisitioned meeting. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 05 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100952