<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 368 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100943</link>
    <description>Removal of excisable goods without sufficient PLA balance was treated as clearance without payment of duty, so the appellant was found not to have established a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty amount. The Calcutta High Court decision relied on was held inapplicable on the facts. Full waiver was therefore declined, and the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs within six weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:25:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 368 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100943</link>
      <description>Removal of excisable goods without sufficient PLA balance was treated as clearance without payment of duty, so the appellant was found not to have established a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty amount. The Calcutta High Court decision relied on was held inapplicable on the facts. Full waiver was therefore declined, and the appellant was directed to deposit Rs. 10 lakhs within six weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>