<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (5) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100906</link>
    <description>Watery coconuts were treated as commercially distinct from dried coconuts because the statutory scheme classified coconuts by stage and market identity, and the Court accepted that different commercial uses can justify separate taxation. The classification of watery coconuts as a separate taxable commodity was upheld. The validating amendments covering earlier assessments and levies were also sustained because they operated at a clearly identified taxable stage and included a safeguard against double taxation, so they did not offend the restrictions applicable to declared goods under the Central Sales Tax Act. The challenge to the levy and validating provisions therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (5) TMI 93 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100906</link>
      <description>Watery coconuts were treated as commercially distinct from dried coconuts because the statutory scheme classified coconuts by stage and market identity, and the Court accepted that different commercial uses can justify separate taxation. The classification of watery coconuts as a separate taxable commodity was upheld. The validating amendments covering earlier assessments and levies were also sustained because they operated at a clearly identified taxable stage and included a safeguard against double taxation, so they did not offend the restrictions applicable to declared goods under the Central Sales Tax Act. The challenge to the levy and validating provisions therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>