<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 620 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100902</link>
    <description>Crushing and pulverising manganese ore into smaller lumps and powder was treated, at a prima facie stage, as not amounting to manufacture. The Tribunal relied on cited precedents and the departmental chemist&#039;s opinion that the product remained manganese ore, and on that basis found a sufficient case for interim relief. Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 620 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100902</link>
      <description>Crushing and pulverising manganese ore into smaller lumps and powder was treated, at a prima facie stage, as not amounting to manufacture. The Tribunal relied on cited precedents and the departmental chemist&#039;s opinion that the product remained manganese ore, and on that basis found a sufficient case for interim relief. Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>