<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 884 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100873</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be disallowed or reversed unless the proper authority first issued a valid notice under Rule 57-I(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. A departmental letter directing reversal was not itself a show cause notice, and the Commissioner (Appeals) had no statutory basis to convert that letter into one or remit the matter for adjudication on that footing. The comparison with Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 reinforced that proper notice is a prerequisite to adjudication. The direction treating the letter as a show cause notice was set aside, and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:20:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 884 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100873</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be disallowed or reversed unless the proper authority first issued a valid notice under Rule 57-I(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. A departmental letter directing reversal was not itself a show cause notice, and the Commissioner (Appeals) had no statutory basis to convert that letter into one or remit the matter for adjudication on that footing. The comparison with Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 reinforced that proper notice is a prerequisite to adjudication. The direction treating the letter as a show cause notice was set aside, and the matter was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>