<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 356 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100855</link>
    <description>For treatment as sewing thread under Note 3 to Section XI, the yarn had to be dressed for use as sewing thread. The departmental test report did not state that this condition was satisfied, and the deficiency was also noted in the impugned order. On that basis, a strong prima facie case was found for the assessee, and the requirement of pre-deposit of central excise duty and penalty was waived pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:44:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 356 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100855</link>
      <description>For treatment as sewing thread under Note 3 to Section XI, the yarn had to be dressed for use as sewing thread. The departmental test report did not state that this condition was satisfied, and the deficiency was also noted in the impugned order. On that basis, a strong prima facie case was found for the assessee, and the requirement of pre-deposit of central excise duty and penalty was waived pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>