<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 355 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100853</link>
    <description>The Tribunal considered the appellants&#039; stay application for waiving the pre-deposit of duty and penalty amount related to clandestine manufacture of M.S. Ingots. Despite challenges to the reliability of electricity consumption experiment results and dropped proceedings against similar manufacturers, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings of dual record-keeping and production suppression. The Tribunal directed a partial pre-deposit of Rs. 5 lakhs by a specified date, failing which the appeal would be dismissed under Section 35F of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:43:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 355 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100853</link>
      <description>The Tribunal considered the appellants&#039; stay application for waiving the pre-deposit of duty and penalty amount related to clandestine manufacture of M.S. Ingots. Despite challenges to the reliability of electricity consumption experiment results and dropped proceedings against similar manufacturers, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings of dual record-keeping and production suppression. The Tribunal directed a partial pre-deposit of Rs. 5 lakhs by a specified date, failing which the appeal would be dismissed under Section 35F of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>