<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 353 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100850</link>
    <description>A show cause notice, read as a whole with the assessee&#039;s admitted shortage of finished goods and modvatable inputs, was treated as sufficient to invoke the extended period and allege suppression and intent to evade duty. On that basis, the penalty equal to duty under Section 11AC read with Rule 57-I(4) of the Central Excise Rules was upheld. However, the Tribunal found no basis for imposing a separate penalty under Rule 173Q on the same facts, and that additional penalty was deleted, giving the assessee only partial relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:33:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 353 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100850</link>
      <description>A show cause notice, read as a whole with the assessee&#039;s admitted shortage of finished goods and modvatable inputs, was treated as sufficient to invoke the extended period and allege suppression and intent to evade duty. On that basis, the penalty equal to duty under Section 11AC read with Rule 57-I(4) of the Central Excise Rules was upheld. However, the Tribunal found no basis for imposing a separate penalty under Rule 173Q on the same facts, and that additional penalty was deleted, giving the assessee only partial relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>