<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 340 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100836</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay pending appeal were justified where the duty demand rested mainly on a transporter&#039;s statement, while the applicants&#039; stock and records showed no discrepancy and no enquiry had been made with the actual manufacturers or suppliers. Refusal of cross-examination at the adjudication stage raised a prima facie issue of denial of natural justice, and the record did not clearly establish suppression by the applicants. The penalties also lacked supporting findings. On this material, a strong prima facie case was made out for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:55:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 340 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100836</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay pending appeal were justified where the duty demand rested mainly on a transporter&#039;s statement, while the applicants&#039; stock and records showed no discrepancy and no enquiry had been made with the actual manufacturers or suppliers. Refusal of cross-examination at the adjudication stage raised a prima facie issue of denial of natural justice, and the record did not clearly establish suppression by the applicants. The penalties also lacked supporting findings. On this material, a strong prima facie case was made out for complete waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>