<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (10) TMI 90 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100822</link>
    <description>Reopening an assessment for escaped turnover under section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act requires relevant material giving the assessing authority a bona fide reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment; the court may examine whether such belief existed and had a rational basis, but not the sufficiency of the material. On the stated facts, prior turnover data, later disclosures, the wheat quota basis, and repeated non-production of accounts were treated as enough to justify initiation. A preliminary notice or memorandum seeking account books did not amount to a statutory section 21 notice, so the one-year period for reassessment ran from the later formal notice and the reassessment was timely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 15:44:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (10) TMI 90 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100822</link>
      <description>Reopening an assessment for escaped turnover under section 21 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act requires relevant material giving the assessing authority a bona fide reason to believe that turnover has escaped assessment; the court may examine whether such belief existed and had a rational basis, but not the sufficiency of the material. On the stated facts, prior turnover data, later disclosures, the wheat quota basis, and repeated non-production of accounts were treated as enough to justify initiation. A preliminary notice or memorandum seeking account books did not amount to a statutory section 21 notice, so the one-year period for reassessment ran from the later formal notice and the reassessment was timely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>