https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100818 The appellate route under Section 9C is confined to orders determining or reviewing the existence, degree and effect of subsidy or dumping in relation to imports, so the special requirement of a Bench comprising the President and two members applies only to that class of matters. An order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) does not fall within that category and is instead an ordinary appeal under Section 129A. The special bench composition under Section 9C(5) was therefore inapplicable, and the matter was returned to the jurisdictional Bench for hearing on merits. en-us Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:09:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100818 The appellate route under Section 9C is confined to orders determining or reviewing the existence, degree and effect of subsidy or dumping in relation to imports, so the special requirement of a Bench comprising the President and two members applies only to that class of matters. An order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) does not fall within that category and is instead an ordinary appeal under Section 129A. The special bench composition under Section 9C(5) was therefore inapplicable, and the matter was returned to the jurisdictional Bench for hearing on merits. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100818