<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 403 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100813</link>
    <description>The classification of the product &quot;Oona&quot; turned on whether it fell under Heading 3003 as a medicament. An earlier decision involving the same appellant had already held that the product was rightly classifiable as a medicament under Heading 3003, and that determination was applied as the governing basis for the present matter. On that footing, the product continued to be treated as classifiable under Heading 3003 and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:01:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 403 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100813</link>
      <description>The classification of the product &quot;Oona&quot; turned on whether it fell under Heading 3003 as a medicament. An earlier decision involving the same appellant had already held that the product was rightly classifiable as a medicament under Heading 3003, and that determination was applied as the governing basis for the present matter. On that footing, the product continued to be treated as classifiable under Heading 3003 and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>