https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100810 A request to modify a stay order directing pre-deposit was refused because financial exigency arising from expenditure on conducting the National Games was not accepted as a valid ground to alter the pre-deposit requirement. The Tribunal held that such ordinary expenditure did not justify relaxation of the existing compliance direction. However, it exercised discretion to extend the time for payment by eight weeks and directed the applicants to report compliance on the specified date. en-us Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:55:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100810 A request to modify a stay order directing pre-deposit was refused because financial exigency arising from expenditure on conducting the National Games was not accepted as a valid ground to alter the pre-deposit requirement. The Tribunal held that such ordinary expenditure did not justify relaxation of the existing compliance direction. However, it exercised discretion to extend the time for payment by eight weeks and directed the applicants to report compliance on the specified date. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100810