<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 551 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100808</link>
    <description>Rule 57G(5) bars Modvat credit from being taken after six months from the date of issue of the prescribed documents, and the time limit is mandatory. Admitted delay, including labour problems, closure of the factory, and non-availability of documents, could not override the express statutory prohibition. Credit claimed beyond the six-month period was therefore inadmissible, and disallowance followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 551 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100808</link>
      <description>Rule 57G(5) bars Modvat credit from being taken after six months from the date of issue of the prescribed documents, and the time limit is mandatory. Admitted delay, including labour problems, closure of the factory, and non-availability of documents, could not override the express statutory prohibition. Credit claimed beyond the six-month period was therefore inadmissible, and disallowance followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>