<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (9) TMI 108 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100793</link>
    <description>Declared goods under the State sales tax regime were taxable only at the point of first sale inside the State. Where cotton yarn had already suffered tax on the first intra-State sale after inter-State movement, its later return to Madras and local resale could not be treated again as the first taxable sale. The same turnover could not be taxed a second time merely because the goods later came back into the State and were sold locally.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (9) TMI 108 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100793</link>
      <description>Declared goods under the State sales tax regime were taxable only at the point of first sale inside the State. Where cotton yarn had already suffered tax on the first intra-State sale after inter-State movement, its later return to Madras and local resale could not be treated again as the first taxable sale. The same turnover could not be taxed a second time merely because the goods later came back into the State and were sold locally.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>