https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100792 The Tribunal allowed all seven appeals against the Order-in-Appeal upholding the confiscation of seized gold and currency, directing a reevaluation by the Commissioner (Appeals). Concerns arose from treating the joint appeal as solely belonging to one individual, necessitating a review to address procedural fairness and natural justice. The six individuals were granted a one-month period to file separate appeals, emphasizing the importance of upholding legal procedures and ensuring all parties receive due consideration in the proceedings. en-us Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:07:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100792 The Tribunal allowed all seven appeals against the Order-in-Appeal upholding the confiscation of seized gold and currency, directing a reevaluation by the Commissioner (Appeals). Concerns arose from treating the joint appeal as solely belonging to one individual, necessitating a review to address procedural fairness and natural justice. The six individuals were granted a one-month period to file separate appeals, emphasizing the importance of upholding legal procedures and ensuring all parties receive due consideration in the proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 18 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100792