<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (7) TMI 94 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100724</link>
    <description>Section 15(1) of the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax Act governed revision of an assessment order where the issue was the legality, propriety or regularity of the exemption granted on auction sales. The dispute was not one of escaped turnover, but of whether the exemption under the commission licence had been correctly allowed; accordingly, the applicable limitation was the four-year period in section 15, measured from communication of the assessment order. The three-year limitation in rule 33 applied only to escaped turnover matters and did not control this revision. The revisional power was therefore validly exercised under section 15(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=137775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (7) TMI 94 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100724</link>
      <description>Section 15(1) of the Travancore-Cochin General Sales Tax Act governed revision of an assessment order where the issue was the legality, propriety or regularity of the exemption granted on auction sales. The dispute was not one of escaped turnover, but of whether the exemption under the commission licence had been correctly allowed; accordingly, the applicable limitation was the four-year period in section 15, measured from communication of the assessment order. The three-year limitation in rule 33 applied only to escaped turnover matters and did not control this revision. The revisional power was therefore validly exercised under section 15(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=100724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>